Microneedling vs Fractora: Which Is Right for You?
A clinical comparison of SkinPen microneedling and Fractora RF microneedling at The London Road Clinic: what each treats, how they differ in mechanism and recovery, and how to decide between them. Written by Lydia Griffin, Clinic Director, JCCP No. 002569.
Published 21 May 2026
SkinPen microneedling and Fractora RF microneedling share a needle-based mechanism and both drive collagen remodelling, but they are not interchangeable. Microneedling suits a broader range of patients and concerns with less downtime. Fractora suits more significant laxity and deeper scarring with a more intensive result and a planned recovery period. The choice between them depends on the concern, skin type, and how much disruption to routine a patient can accommodate.
What they share and where they diverge
Both treatments use fine needles to penetrate the skin and trigger the body’s wound-healing cascade, producing new collagen and elastin as part of the repair process. From that shared starting point, the two treatments take different paths.
Standard microneedling, using the SkinPen device at The London Road Clinic, creates micro-injuries through mechanical action alone. The needles puncture the skin; the inflammatory repair response follows; collagen remodelling develops over four to twelve weeks per session. The stimulus is the injury itself.
Fractora adds a second stimulus: radiofrequency energy delivered at the needle tip. This creates a zone of controlled thermal injury in the dermis alongside the mechanical injury. The thermal component contracts existing collagen immediately and triggers a more intense reparative response than mechanical injury alone. The result is stronger remodelling, better suited to laxity and deeper structural concerns, at the cost of more recovery time and a more involved post-treatment period.
Detailed individual guides for both treatments are at the microneedling patient guide and the Fractora patient guide.
Head-to-head comparison
| Compare | SkinPen Microneedling | Fractora RF Microneedling |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Mechanical micro-injury triggering wound-healing cascade and collagen induction | Mechanical micro-injury plus RF thermal energy at needle tip, triggering collagen contraction and stronger remodelling |
| Device manufacturer | SkinPen (Crown Aesthetics) | InMode |
| Primary strength | Skin texture, acne scarring, general skin quality, hair restoration | Skin laxity, deeper acne scarring, significant skin quality decline, perioral lines |
| Laxity treatment | Limited, collagen induction helps mild quality-related laxity but does not contract existing collagen | Strong, RF thermal energy contracts existing collagen immediately and drives deeper remodelling |
| Acne scarring | Good for mild to moderate scarring, particularly texture and post-inflammatory marks | Better for moderate to severe scarring where deeper remodelling is required |
| Typical course | 3–6 sessions, 4–6 weeks apart | 3–4 sessions, 4–6 weeks apart |
| Recovery per session | 1–2 days redness; most patients return to work and make-up the following day | 3–7 days: redness, swelling, crusting at needle sites; planned downtime required |
| Discomfort | Mild with topical anaesthetic; most describe as pressure rather than pain | Moderate with topical anaesthetic; more intense during treatment, more sensitive in recovery |
| Skin type suitability | Suitable across Fitzpatrick types I–VI with appropriate depth settings; lower PIH risk | Suitable for Fitzpatrick types I–IV with appropriate parameters; types V–VI require conservative settings and careful assessment |
| Pacemaker contraindication | No, microneedling does not use RF energy | Yes, RF is contraindicated with pacemakers and implantable cardiac devices (absolute) |
| Exosome enhancement | Yes, BLESKIN EXXO exosomes applied topically post-treatment via open micro-channels | Post-treatment topical actives applied; exosome enhancement discussed at consultation |
| Best described as | The lower-intensity, regular-interval approach for consistent skin quality improvement | The higher-intensity, planned-recovery approach for more significant concerns |
Choose microneedling if
- Your primary concerns are skin texture, surface irregularity, mild to moderate acne scarring, enlarged pores, or general skin quality improvement.
- Downtime is a meaningful constraint: you cannot plan for three to seven days of visible recovery around your schedule.
- You have a darker skin tone (Fitzpatrick type V or VI) where the lower thermal burden of standard microneedling reduces post-inflammatory pigmentation risk.
- You want to combine treatment with BLESKIN EXXO exosome enhancement for a regenerative approach to scarring or quality decline.
- You are beginning a treatment programme and want to establish results at a lower intensity before escalating if needed.
- Your concern is hair restoration, where scalp microneedling supports follicle activity alongside polynucleotide injections.
Microneedling is the appropriate starting point for the majority of patients seeking collagen induction. It is not the lesser option; it is the right option for a large patient population, and the results over a well-managed course are meaningful.
Choose Fractora if
- Your primary concerns include skin laxity in the lower face, jaw line or neck that standard microneedling has limited ability to address.
- Your acne scarring is moderate to severe, and previous microneedling courses have produced limited structural improvement.
- You want a stronger remodelling result per session and are willing to accept planned recovery time to achieve it.
- Your concern includes perioral lines or crepey skin in areas that benefit from the deeper thermal stimulus.
- You have a pacemaker or implantable cardiac device: note that this makes Fractora contraindicated, not more appropriate. Return to microneedling as the RF-free option.
- You are combining Fractora with Forma (surface RF) as part of a programme: Forma for maintenance, Fractora for the intensive intervals.
Can they be used together?
Yes, and some treatment programmes incorporate both. A common structure at The London Road Clinic is alternating Fractora and standard microneedling sessions over a longer programme: Fractora for the more intensive collagen and laxity remodelling at wider intervals, microneedling between them for maintenance and continued skin quality improvement. This is discussed and structured at consultation rather than decided independently by patients.
Both treatments can also be used alongside other interventions:
- Polynucleotides address cellular repair alongside the mechanical/thermal collagen stimulus from needling. The polynucleotides patient guide covers how the mechanisms are complementary.
- Chemical peels address the surface pigmentation and texture component that needling treatments approach from the structural side. See the chemical peels patient guide.
- Bio-remodelling injectables (Profhilo, polynucleotides) address skin quality and hydration at a different layer from the remodelling stimulus of needling. These are sequenced rather than combined on the same day.
The decision at consultation
The choice between microneedling and Fractora is rarely obvious from a patient’s own assessment of their concerns, and it should not be. The degree of scarring, the clinical assessment of laxity, skin type, current skincare, and the patient’s availability to recover from treatment all feed into the decision.
At The London Road Clinic, both options are assessed and explained at consultation. Where the concern sits clearly in one treatment’s territory, the recommendation is direct. Where both are appropriate, the trade-offs are discussed and the patient decides based on full information. Read more about what to expect at a consultation at The London Road Clinic.
Related advice
Patient Guide: Fractora
A comprehensive patient guide to Fractora fractional RF microneedling at The London Road Clinic: how it works, what it treats, recovery, and how it compares to microneedling and Forma. Written by Lydia Griffin, Clinic Director, JCCP No. 002569.
21 May 2026
Patient Guide: Microneedling
A comprehensive patient guide to medical-grade microneedling at The London Road Clinic: how SkinPen works, what it treats, what to expect, and how it compares to other collagen induction treatments. Written by Lydia Griffin, Clinic Director, JCCP No. 002569.
21 May 2026
Forma vs Fractora: Which RF Treatment Is Right for You?
A clinical comparison of Forma surface RF and Fractora RF microneedling at The London Road Clinic: what each does, how they differ in intensity and recovery, and how they are used together. Written by Lydia Griffin, Clinic Director, JCCP No. 002569.
21 May 2026